 View on TensorFlow.org
|
 Run in Google Colab
|
 View on GitHub
|
 Download notebook
|
 See TF Hub model
|
TF-Hub is a platform to share machine learning expertise packaged in reusable resources, notably pre-trained modules. In this tutorial, we will use a TF-Hub text embedding module to train a simple sentiment classifier with a reasonable baseline accuracy. We will then submit the predictions to Kaggle.
For more detailed tutorial on text classification with TF-Hub and further steps for improving the accuracy, take a look at Text classification with TF-Hub.
Setup
pip install -q kaggle
import tensorflow as tf
import tensorflow_hub as hub
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import zipfile
from sklearn import model_selection
2022-12-14 13:51:31.909585: W tensorflow/compiler/xla/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:64] Could not load dynamic library 'libnvinfer.so.7'; dlerror: libnvinfer.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 2022-12-14 13:51:31.909687: W tensorflow/compiler/xla/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:64] Could not load dynamic library 'libnvinfer_plugin.so.7'; dlerror: libnvinfer_plugin.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 2022-12-14 13:51:31.909696: W tensorflow/compiler/tf2tensorrt/utils/py_utils.cc:38] TF-TRT Warning: Cannot dlopen some TensorRT libraries. If you would like to use Nvidia GPU with TensorRT, please make sure the missing libraries mentioned above are installed properly.
Since this tutorial will be using a dataset from Kaggle, it requires creating an API Token for your Kaggle account, and uploading it to the Colab environment.
import os
import pathlib
# Upload the API token.
def get_kaggle():
try:
import kaggle
return kaggle
except OSError:
pass
token_file = pathlib.Path("~/.kaggle/kaggle.json").expanduser()
token_file.parent.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
try:
from google.colab import files
except ImportError:
raise ValueError("Could not find kaggle token.")
uploaded = files.upload()
token_content = uploaded.get('kaggle.json', None)
if token_content:
token_file.write_bytes(token_content)
token_file.chmod(0o600)
else:
raise ValueError('Need a file named "kaggle.json"')
import kaggle
return kaggle
kaggle = get_kaggle()
Getting started
Data
We will try to solve the Sentiment Analysis on Movie Reviews task from Kaggle. The dataset consists of syntactic subphrases of the Rotten Tomatoes movie reviews. The task is to label the phrases as negative or positive on the scale from 1 to 5.
You must accept the competition rules before you can use the API to download the data.
SENTIMENT_LABELS = [
"negative", "somewhat negative", "neutral", "somewhat positive", "positive"
]
# Add a column with readable values representing the sentiment.
def add_readable_labels_column(df, sentiment_value_column):
df["SentimentLabel"] = df[sentiment_value_column].replace(
range(5), SENTIMENT_LABELS)
# Download data from Kaggle and create a DataFrame.
def load_data_from_zip(path):
with zipfile.ZipFile(path, "r") as zip_ref:
name = zip_ref.namelist()[0]
with zip_ref.open(name) as zf:
return pd.read_csv(zf, sep="\t", index_col=0)
# The data does not come with a validation set so we'll create one from the
# training set.
def get_data(competition, train_file, test_file, validation_set_ratio=0.1):
data_path = pathlib.Path("data")
kaggle.api.competition_download_files(competition, data_path)
competition_path = (data_path/competition)
competition_path.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
competition_zip_path = competition_path.with_suffix(".zip")
with zipfile.ZipFile(competition_zip_path, "r") as zip_ref:
zip_ref.extractall(competition_path)
train_df = load_data_from_zip(competition_path/train_file)
test_df = load_data_from_zip(competition_path/test_file)
# Add a human readable label.
add_readable_labels_column(train_df, "Sentiment")
# We split by sentence ids, because we don't want to have phrases belonging
# to the same sentence in both training and validation set.
train_indices, validation_indices = model_selection.train_test_split(
np.unique(train_df["SentenceId"]),
test_size=validation_set_ratio,
random_state=0)
validation_df = train_df[train_df["SentenceId"].isin(validation_indices)]
train_df = train_df[train_df["SentenceId"].isin(train_indices)]
print("Split the training data into %d training and %d validation examples." %
(len(train_df), len(validation_df)))
return train_df, validation_df, test_df
train_df, validation_df, test_df = get_data(
"sentiment-analysis-on-movie-reviews",
"train.tsv.zip", "test.tsv.zip")
Split the training data into 140315 training and 15745 validation examples.
train_df.head(20)
Training an Model
class MyModel(tf.keras.Model):
def __init__(self, hub_url):
super().__init__()
self.hub_url = hub_url
self.embed = hub.load(self.hub_url).signatures['default']
self.sequential = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Dense(500),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(100),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(5),
])
def call(self, inputs):
phrases = inputs['Phrase'][:,0]
embedding = 5*self.embed(phrases)['default']
return self.sequential(embedding)
def get_config(self):
return {"hub_url":self.hub_url}
model = MyModel("https://tfhub.dev/google/nnlm-en-dim128/1")
model.compile(
loss = tf.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer=tf.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics = [tf.keras.metrics.SparseCategoricalAccuracy(name="accuracy")])
history = model.fit(x=dict(train_df), y=train_df['Sentiment'],
validation_data=(dict(validation_df), validation_df['Sentiment']),
epochs = 25)
Epoch 1/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 14s 3ms/step - loss: 1.0249 - accuracy: 0.5847 - val_loss: 0.9924 - val_accuracy: 0.5933 Epoch 2/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9998 - accuracy: 0.5944 - val_loss: 0.9863 - val_accuracy: 0.5933 Epoch 3/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9951 - accuracy: 0.5969 - val_loss: 0.9818 - val_accuracy: 0.5960 Epoch 4/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9932 - accuracy: 0.5976 - val_loss: 0.9774 - val_accuracy: 0.5987 Epoch 5/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9913 - accuracy: 0.5974 - val_loss: 0.9830 - val_accuracy: 0.5956 Epoch 6/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9906 - accuracy: 0.5983 - val_loss: 0.9825 - val_accuracy: 0.5966 Epoch 7/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9894 - accuracy: 0.5977 - val_loss: 0.9829 - val_accuracy: 0.5910 Epoch 8/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9890 - accuracy: 0.5994 - val_loss: 0.9788 - val_accuracy: 0.5944 Epoch 9/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9887 - accuracy: 0.5990 - val_loss: 0.9742 - val_accuracy: 0.5995 Epoch 10/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9879 - accuracy: 0.5994 - val_loss: 0.9794 - val_accuracy: 0.5963 Epoch 11/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9876 - accuracy: 0.5990 - val_loss: 0.9734 - val_accuracy: 0.6020 Epoch 12/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9874 - accuracy: 0.5991 - val_loss: 0.9835 - val_accuracy: 0.5973 Epoch 13/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9870 - accuracy: 0.5983 - val_loss: 0.9777 - val_accuracy: 0.5992 Epoch 14/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9869 - accuracy: 0.5998 - val_loss: 0.9805 - val_accuracy: 0.5950 Epoch 15/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9868 - accuracy: 0.6003 - val_loss: 0.9758 - val_accuracy: 0.6016 Epoch 16/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9867 - accuracy: 0.6007 - val_loss: 0.9818 - val_accuracy: 0.5920 Epoch 17/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9867 - accuracy: 0.5993 - val_loss: 0.9800 - val_accuracy: 0.5969 Epoch 18/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9863 - accuracy: 0.5994 - val_loss: 0.9821 - val_accuracy: 0.5987 Epoch 19/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9862 - accuracy: 0.5993 - val_loss: 0.9792 - val_accuracy: 0.5949 Epoch 20/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9860 - accuracy: 0.5998 - val_loss: 0.9828 - val_accuracy: 0.5944 Epoch 21/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9861 - accuracy: 0.5997 - val_loss: 0.9873 - val_accuracy: 0.5907 Epoch 22/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 13s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9859 - accuracy: 0.6000 - val_loss: 0.9778 - val_accuracy: 0.5965 Epoch 23/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9853 - accuracy: 0.5999 - val_loss: 0.9773 - val_accuracy: 0.6008 Epoch 24/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9857 - accuracy: 0.6003 - val_loss: 0.9770 - val_accuracy: 0.5975 Epoch 25/25 4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9854 - accuracy: 0.6009 - val_loss: 0.9863 - val_accuracy: 0.5893
Prediction
Run predictions for the validation set and training set.
plt.plot(history.history['accuracy'])
plt.plot(history.history['val_accuracy'])
[<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7f22688479d0>]
train_eval_result = model.evaluate(dict(train_df), train_df['Sentiment'])
validation_eval_result = model.evaluate(dict(validation_df), validation_df['Sentiment'])
print(f"Training set accuracy: {train_eval_result[1]}")
print(f"Validation set accuracy: {validation_eval_result[1]}")
4385/4385 [==============================] - 12s 3ms/step - loss: 0.9866 - accuracy: 0.5985 493/493 [==============================] - 1s 2ms/step - loss: 0.9863 - accuracy: 0.5893 Training set accuracy: 0.5984748601913452 Validation set accuracy: 0.5892664194107056
Confusion matrix
Another very interesting statistic, especially for multiclass problems, is the confusion matrix. The confusion matrix allows visualization of the proportion of correctly and incorrectly labelled examples. We can easily see how much our classifier is biased and whether the distribution of labels makes sense. Ideally the largest fraction of predictions should be distributed along the diagonal.
predictions = model.predict(dict(validation_df))
predictions = tf.argmax(predictions, axis=-1)
predictions
493/493 [==============================] - 1s 2ms/step <tf.Tensor: shape=(15745,), dtype=int64, numpy=array([1, 1, 2, ..., 2, 2, 2])>
cm = tf.math.confusion_matrix(validation_df['Sentiment'], predictions)
cm = cm/cm.numpy().sum(axis=1)[:, tf.newaxis]
sns.heatmap(
cm, annot=True,
xticklabels=SENTIMENT_LABELS,
yticklabels=SENTIMENT_LABELS)
plt.xlabel("Predicted")
plt.ylabel("True")
Text(50.72222222222221, 0.5, 'True')
We can easily submit the predictions back to Kaggle by pasting the following code to a code cell and executing it:
test_predictions = model.predict(dict(test_df))
test_predictions = np.argmax(test_predictions, axis=-1)
result_df = test_df.copy()
result_df["Predictions"] = test_predictions
result_df.to_csv(
"predictions.csv",
columns=["Predictions"],
header=["Sentiment"])
kaggle.api.competition_submit("predictions.csv", "Submitted from Colab",
"sentiment-analysis-on-movie-reviews")
After submitting, check the leaderboard to see how you did.