Zobacz na TensorFlow.org | Uruchom w Google Colab | Wyświetl źródło na GitHub | Pobierz notatnik |
W tym Colab badamy niektóre z podstawowych cech TensorFlow Probability.
Zależności i wymagania wstępne
Import
from pprint import pprint
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import seaborn as sns
import tensorflow.compat.v2 as tf
tf.enable_v2_behavior()
import tensorflow_probability as tfp
sns.reset_defaults()
sns.set_context(context='talk',font_scale=0.7)
plt.rcParams['image.cmap'] = 'viridis'
%matplotlib inline
tfd = tfp.distributions
tfb = tfp.bijectors
Narzędzia
def print_subclasses_from_module(module, base_class, maxwidth=80):
import functools, inspect, sys
subclasses = [name for name, obj in inspect.getmembers(module)
if inspect.isclass(obj) and issubclass(obj, base_class)]
def red(acc, x):
if not acc or len(acc[-1]) + len(x) + 2 > maxwidth:
acc.append(x)
else:
acc[-1] += ", " + x
return acc
print('\n'.join(functools.reduce(red, subclasses, [])))
Zarys
- Przepływ Tensora
- Prawdopodobieństwo przepływu Tensor
- Dystrybucje
- Bijektory
- MCMC
- ...i więcej!
Preambuła: TensorFlow
TensorFlow to naukowa biblioteka obliczeniowa.
To wspiera
- dużo operacji matematycznych
- wydajne obliczenia wektorowe
- łatwe przyspieszenie sprzętowe
- automatyczne różnicowanie
Wektoryzacja
- Wektoryzacja przyspiesza!
- Oznacza to również, że dużo myślimy o kształtach
mats = tf.random.uniform(shape=[1000, 10, 10])
vecs = tf.random.uniform(shape=[1000, 10, 1])
def for_loop_solve():
return np.array(
[tf.linalg.solve(mats[i, ...], vecs[i, ...]) for i in range(1000)])
def vectorized_solve():
return tf.linalg.solve(mats, vecs)
# Vectorization for the win!
%timeit for_loop_solve()
%timeit vectorized_solve()
1 loops, best of 3: 2 s per loop 1000 loops, best of 3: 653 µs per loop
Przyspieszenie sprzętowe
# Code can run seamlessly on a GPU, just change Colab runtime type
# in the 'Runtime' menu.
if tf.test.gpu_device_name() == '/device:GPU:0':
print("Using a GPU")
else:
print("Using a CPU")
Using a CPU
Automatyczne różnicowanie
a = tf.constant(np.pi)
b = tf.constant(np.e)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
tape.watch([a, b])
c = .5 * (a**2 + b**2)
grads = tape.gradient(c, [a, b])
print(grads[0])
print(grads[1])
tf.Tensor(3.1415927, shape=(), dtype=float32) tf.Tensor(2.7182817, shape=(), dtype=float32)
Prawdopodobieństwo przepływu Tensor
TensorFlow Probability to biblioteka do wnioskowania probabilistycznego i analizy statystycznej w TensorFlow.
Wspieramy modelowanie, wnioskowanie i krytykę poprzez składu niskopoziomowych elementów modułowych.
Niskopoziomowe klocki
- Dystrybucje
- Bijektory
Konstrukcje wyższego (wyższy) poziomu
- Łańcuch Markowa Monte Carlo
- Warstwy probabilistyczne
- Konstrukcyjne szeregi czasowe
- Uogólnione modele liniowe
- Optymalizatory
Dystrybucje
tfp.distributions.Distribution
jest klasa z dwoma podstawowymi sposobami: sample
i log_prob
.
TFP ma wiele dystrybucji!
print_subclasses_from_module(tfp.distributions, tfp.distributions.Distribution)
Autoregressive, BatchReshape, Bates, Bernoulli, Beta, BetaBinomial, Binomial Blockwise, Categorical, Cauchy, Chi, Chi2, CholeskyLKJ, ContinuousBernoulli Deterministic, Dirichlet, DirichletMultinomial, Distribution, DoublesidedMaxwell Empirical, ExpGamma, ExpRelaxedOneHotCategorical, Exponential, FiniteDiscrete Gamma, GammaGamma, GaussianProcess, GaussianProcessRegressionModel GeneralizedNormal, GeneralizedPareto, Geometric, Gumbel, HalfCauchy, HalfNormal HalfStudentT, HiddenMarkovModel, Horseshoe, Independent, InverseGamma InverseGaussian, JohnsonSU, JointDistribution, JointDistributionCoroutine JointDistributionCoroutineAutoBatched, JointDistributionNamed JointDistributionNamedAutoBatched, JointDistributionSequential JointDistributionSequentialAutoBatched, Kumaraswamy, LKJ, Laplace LinearGaussianStateSpaceModel, LogLogistic, LogNormal, Logistic, LogitNormal Mixture, MixtureSameFamily, Moyal, Multinomial, MultivariateNormalDiag MultivariateNormalDiagPlusLowRank, MultivariateNormalFullCovariance MultivariateNormalLinearOperator, MultivariateNormalTriL MultivariateStudentTLinearOperator, NegativeBinomial, Normal, OneHotCategorical OrderedLogistic, PERT, Pareto, PixelCNN, PlackettLuce, Poisson PoissonLogNormalQuadratureCompound, PowerSpherical, ProbitBernoulli QuantizedDistribution, RelaxedBernoulli, RelaxedOneHotCategorical, Sample SinhArcsinh, SphericalUniform, StudentT, StudentTProcess TransformedDistribution, Triangular, TruncatedCauchy, TruncatedNormal, Uniform VariationalGaussianProcess, VectorDeterministic, VonMises VonMisesFisher, Weibull, WishartLinearOperator, WishartTriL, Zipf
Prosty skalar-variate Distribution
# A standard normal
normal = tfd.Normal(loc=0., scale=1.)
print(normal)
tfp.distributions.Normal("Normal", batch_shape=[], event_shape=[], dtype=float32)
# Plot 1000 samples from a standard normal
samples = normal.sample(1000)
sns.distplot(samples)
plt.title("Samples from a standard Normal")
plt.show()
# Compute the log_prob of a point in the event space of `normal`
normal.log_prob(0.)
<tf.Tensor: shape=(), dtype=float32, numpy=-0.9189385>
# Compute the log_prob of a few points
normal.log_prob([-1., 0., 1.])
<tf.Tensor: shape=(3,), dtype=float32, numpy=array([-1.4189385, -0.9189385, -1.4189385], dtype=float32)>
Dystrybucje i kształty
NumPy ndarrays
i TensorFlow Tensors
mieć kształty.
TensorFlow prawdopodobieństwa Distributions
mają semantykę Shape - kształty działowych mamy do semantycznie różne kawałki, choć sam fragment pamięci ( Tensor
/ ndarray
) jest używany dla całego wszystkiego.
- Kształt partii oznacza zbiór
Distribution
S o różnych parametrach - Kształt wydarzenie oznacza kształt próbek z
Distribution
.
Kształty wsadowe zawsze umieszczamy po „lewej”, a kształty zdarzeń po „prawej”.
Partia skalar-variate Distributions
Partie są jak rozkłady „wektoryzowane”: niezależne instancje, których obliczenia odbywają się równolegle.
# Create a batch of 3 normals, and plot 1000 samples from each
normals = tfd.Normal([-2.5, 0., 2.5], 1.) # The scale parameter broadacasts!
print("Batch shape:", normals.batch_shape)
print("Event shape:", normals.event_shape)
Batch shape: (3,) Event shape: ()
# Samples' shapes go on the left!
samples = normals.sample(1000)
print("Shape of samples:", samples.shape)
Shape of samples: (1000, 3)
# Sample shapes can themselves be more complicated
print("Shape of samples:", normals.sample([10, 10, 10]).shape)
Shape of samples: (10, 10, 10, 3)
# A batch of normals gives a batch of log_probs.
print(normals.log_prob([-2.5, 0., 2.5]))
tf.Tensor([-0.9189385 -0.9189385 -0.9189385], shape=(3,), dtype=float32)
# The computation broadcasts, so a batch of normals applied to a scalar
# also gives a batch of log_probs.
print(normals.log_prob(0.))
tf.Tensor([-4.0439386 -0.9189385 -4.0439386], shape=(3,), dtype=float32)
# Normal numpy-like broadcasting rules apply!
xs = np.linspace(-6, 6, 200)
try:
normals.log_prob(xs)
except Exception as e:
print("TFP error:", e.message)
TFP error: Incompatible shapes: [200] vs. [3] [Op:SquaredDifference]
# That fails for the same reason this does:
try:
np.zeros(200) + np.zeros(3)
except Exception as e:
print("Numpy error:", e)
Numpy error: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (200,) (3,)
# But this would work:
a = np.zeros([200, 1]) + np.zeros(3)
print("Broadcast shape:", a.shape)
Broadcast shape: (200, 3)
# And so will this!
xs = np.linspace(-6, 6, 200)[..., np.newaxis]
# => shape = [200, 1]
lps = normals.log_prob(xs)
print("Broadcast log_prob shape:", lps.shape)
Broadcast log_prob shape: (200, 3)
# Summarizing visually
for i in range(3):
sns.distplot(samples[:, i], kde=False, norm_hist=True)
plt.plot(np.tile(xs, 3), normals.prob(xs), c='k', alpha=.5)
plt.title("Samples from 3 Normals, and their PDF's")
plt.show()
Wektor-variate Distribution
mvn = tfd.MultivariateNormalDiag(loc=[0., 0.], scale_diag = [1., 1.])
print("Batch shape:", mvn.batch_shape)
print("Event shape:", mvn.event_shape)
Batch shape: () Event shape: (2,)
samples = mvn.sample(1000)
print("Samples shape:", samples.shape)
Samples shape: (1000, 2)
g = sns.jointplot(samples[:, 0], samples[:, 1], kind='scatter')
plt.show()
Matryca-variate Distribution
lkj = tfd.LKJ(dimension=10, concentration=[1.5, 3.0])
print("Batch shape: ", lkj.batch_shape)
print("Event shape: ", lkj.event_shape)
Batch shape: (2,) Event shape: (10, 10)
samples = lkj.sample()
print("Samples shape: ", samples.shape)
Samples shape: (2, 10, 10)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2, figsize=(6, 3))
sns.heatmap(samples[0, ...], ax=axes[0], cbar=False)
sns.heatmap(samples[1, ...], ax=axes[1], cbar=False)
fig.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Procesy Gaussa
kernel = tfp.math.psd_kernels.ExponentiatedQuadratic()
xs = np.linspace(-5., 5., 200).reshape([-1, 1])
gp = tfd.GaussianProcess(kernel, index_points=xs)
print("Batch shape:", gp.batch_shape)
print("Event shape:", gp.event_shape)
Batch shape: () Event shape: (200,)
upper, lower = gp.mean() + [2 * gp.stddev(), -2 * gp.stddev()]
plt.plot(xs, gp.mean())
plt.fill_between(xs[..., 0], upper, lower, color='k', alpha=.1)
for _ in range(5):
plt.plot(xs, gp.sample(), c='r', alpha=.3)
plt.title(r"GP prior mean, $2\sigma$ intervals, and samples")
plt.show()
# *** Bonus question ***
# Why do so many of these functions lie outside the 95% intervals?
Regresja lekarza rodzinnego
# Suppose we have some observed data
obs_x = [[-3.], [0.], [2.]] # Shape 3x1 (3 1-D vectors)
obs_y = [3., -2., 2.] # Shape 3 (3 scalars)
gprm = tfd.GaussianProcessRegressionModel(kernel, xs, obs_x, obs_y)
upper, lower = gprm.mean() + [2 * gprm.stddev(), -2 * gprm.stddev()]
plt.plot(xs, gprm.mean())
plt.fill_between(xs[..., 0], upper, lower, color='k', alpha=.1)
for _ in range(5):
plt.plot(xs, gprm.sample(), c='r', alpha=.3)
plt.scatter(obs_x, obs_y, c='k', zorder=3)
plt.title(r"GP posterior mean, $2\sigma$ intervals, and samples")
plt.show()
Bijektory
Bijektory reprezentują (w większości) odwracalne, gładkie funkcje. Mogą być używane do przekształcania rozkładów, zachowując możliwość pobierania próbek i obliczania log_probs. Mogą one być w tfp.bijectors
modułu.
Każdy bijector wdraża co najmniej 3 metody:
-
forward
, -
inverse
, a - (co najmniej) jednym
forward_log_det_jacobian
iinverse_log_det_jacobian
.
Dzięki tym składnikom możemy przekształcić rozkład i nadal pobierać próbki i logować probówki z wyniku!
W matematyce trochę niechlujnie
- \(X\) jest zmienną losową z pdf \(p(x)\)
- \(g\) jest gładka, odwracalna funkcja w przestrzeni \(X\)jest
- \(Y = g(X)\) to nowy, przekształcony zmienną losową
- \(p(Y=y) = p(X=g^{-1}(y)) \cdot |\nabla g^{-1}(y)|\)
Buforowanie
Bijectory również buforują obliczenia w przód i w tył oraz log-det-Jacobians, co pozwala nam zaoszczędzić powtarzających się potencjalnie bardzo kosztownych operacji!
print_subclasses_from_module(tfp.bijectors, tfp.bijectors.Bijector)
AbsoluteValue, Affine, AffineLinearOperator, AffineScalar, BatchNormalization Bijector, Blockwise, Chain, CholeskyOuterProduct, CholeskyToInvCholesky CorrelationCholesky, Cumsum, DiscreteCosineTransform, Exp, Expm1, FFJORD FillScaleTriL, FillTriangular, FrechetCDF, GeneralizedExtremeValueCDF GeneralizedPareto, GompertzCDF, GumbelCDF, Identity, Inline, Invert IteratedSigmoidCentered, KumaraswamyCDF, LambertWTail, Log, Log1p MaskedAutoregressiveFlow, MatrixInverseTriL, MatvecLU, MoyalCDF, NormalCDF Ordered, Pad, Permute, PowerTransform, RationalQuadraticSpline, RayleighCDF RealNVP, Reciprocal, Reshape, Scale, ScaleMatvecDiag, ScaleMatvecLU ScaleMatvecLinearOperator, ScaleMatvecTriL, ScaleTriL, Shift, ShiftedGompertzCDF Sigmoid, Sinh, SinhArcsinh, SoftClip, Softfloor, SoftmaxCentered, Softplus Softsign, Split, Square, Tanh, TransformDiagonal, Transpose, WeibullCDF
Prosty Bijector
normal_cdf = tfp.bijectors.NormalCDF()
xs = np.linspace(-4., 4., 200)
plt.plot(xs, normal_cdf.forward(xs))
plt.show()
plt.plot(xs, normal_cdf.forward_log_det_jacobian(xs, event_ndims=0))
plt.show()
Bijector
przekształcenia Distribution
exp_bijector = tfp.bijectors.Exp()
log_normal = exp_bijector(tfd.Normal(0., .5))
samples = log_normal.sample(1000)
xs = np.linspace(1e-10, np.max(samples), 200)
sns.distplot(samples, norm_hist=True, kde=False)
plt.plot(xs, log_normal.prob(xs), c='k', alpha=.75)
plt.show()
dozujący Bijectors
# Create a batch of bijectors of shape [3,]
softplus = tfp.bijectors.Softplus(
hinge_softness=[1., .5, .1])
print("Hinge softness shape:", softplus.hinge_softness.shape)
Hinge softness shape: (3,)
# For broadcasting, we want this to be shape [200, 1]
xs = np.linspace(-4., 4., 200)[..., np.newaxis]
ys = softplus.forward(xs)
print("Forward shape:", ys.shape)
Forward shape: (200, 3)
# Visualization
lines = plt.plot(np.tile(xs, 3), ys)
for line, hs in zip(lines, softplus.hinge_softness):
line.set_label("Softness: %1.1f" % hs)
plt.legend()
plt.show()
Buforowanie
# This bijector represents a matrix outer product on the forward pass,
# and a cholesky decomposition on the inverse pass. The latter costs O(N^3)!
bij = tfb.CholeskyOuterProduct()
size = 2500
# Make a big, lower-triangular matrix
big_lower_triangular = tf.eye(size)
# Squaring it gives us a positive-definite matrix
big_positive_definite = bij.forward(big_lower_triangular)
# Caching for the win!
%timeit bij.inverse(big_positive_definite)
%timeit tf.linalg.cholesky(big_positive_definite)
10000 loops, best of 3: 114 µs per loop 1 loops, best of 3: 208 ms per loop
MCMC
TFP ma wbudowane wsparcie dla niektórych standardowych algorytmów Monte Carlo łańcucha Markowa, w tym Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.
Wygeneruj zestaw danych
# Generate some data
def f(x, w):
# Pad x with 1's so we can add bias via matmul
x = tf.pad(x, [[1, 0], [0, 0]], constant_values=1)
linop = tf.linalg.LinearOperatorFullMatrix(w[..., np.newaxis])
result = linop.matmul(x, adjoint=True)
return result[..., 0, :]
num_features = 2
num_examples = 50
noise_scale = .5
true_w = np.array([-1., 2., 3.])
xs = np.random.uniform(-1., 1., [num_features, num_examples])
ys = f(xs, true_w) + np.random.normal(0., noise_scale, size=num_examples)
# Visualize the data set
plt.scatter(*xs, c=ys, s=100, linewidths=0)
grid = np.meshgrid(*([np.linspace(-1, 1, 100)] * 2))
xs_grid = np.stack(grid, axis=0)
fs_grid = f(xs_grid.reshape([num_features, -1]), true_w)
fs_grid = np.reshape(fs_grid, [100, 100])
plt.colorbar()
plt.contour(xs_grid[0, ...], xs_grid[1, ...], fs_grid, 20, linewidths=1)
plt.show()
Zdefiniuj naszą wspólną funkcję log-prob
Nieznormalizowanych posterior jest wynikiem zamknięcia nad danymi w celu utworzenia częściowego stosowania wspólnego prob dziennika.
# Define the joint_log_prob function, and our unnormalized posterior.
def joint_log_prob(w, x, y):
# Our model in maths is
# w ~ MVN([0, 0, 0], diag([1, 1, 1]))
# y_i ~ Normal(w @ x_i, noise_scale), i=1..N
rv_w = tfd.MultivariateNormalDiag(
loc=np.zeros(num_features + 1),
scale_diag=np.ones(num_features + 1))
rv_y = tfd.Normal(f(x, w), noise_scale)
return (rv_w.log_prob(w) +
tf.reduce_sum(rv_y.log_prob(y), axis=-1))
# Create our unnormalized target density by currying x and y from the joint.
def unnormalized_posterior(w):
return joint_log_prob(w, xs, ys)
Zbuduj HMC TransitionKernel i wywołaj sample_chain
# Create an HMC TransitionKernel
hmc_kernel = tfp.mcmc.HamiltonianMonteCarlo(
target_log_prob_fn=unnormalized_posterior,
step_size=np.float64(.1),
num_leapfrog_steps=2)
# We wrap sample_chain in tf.function, telling TF to precompile a reusable
# computation graph, which will dramatically improve performance.
@tf.function
def run_chain(initial_state, num_results=1000, num_burnin_steps=500):
return tfp.mcmc.sample_chain(
num_results=num_results,
num_burnin_steps=num_burnin_steps,
current_state=initial_state,
kernel=hmc_kernel,
trace_fn=lambda current_state, kernel_results: kernel_results)
initial_state = np.zeros(num_features + 1)
samples, kernel_results = run_chain(initial_state)
print("Acceptance rate:", kernel_results.is_accepted.numpy().mean())
Acceptance rate: 0.915
To nie jest wspaniałe! Chcielibyśmy, aby wskaźnik akceptacji był bliższy 0,65.
(patrz "optymalne skalowanie dla różnych algorytmów Metropolis-Hastings" , Roberts & Rosenthal, 2001)
Adaptacyjne rozmiary kroków
Możemy owinąć naszą HMC TransitionKernel w SimpleStepSizeAdaptation
„meta-jądro”, które będą miały zastosowanie pewne (raczej proste heurystyczne) logikę dostosowania wielkości kroku HMC podczas Burnin. Przeznaczamy 80% wypalania na dostosowanie wielkości kroku, a następnie pozostawiamy pozostałe 20% tylko na mieszanie.
# Apply a simple step size adaptation during burnin
@tf.function
def run_chain(initial_state, num_results=1000, num_burnin_steps=500):
adaptive_kernel = tfp.mcmc.SimpleStepSizeAdaptation(
hmc_kernel,
num_adaptation_steps=int(.8 * num_burnin_steps),
target_accept_prob=np.float64(.65))
return tfp.mcmc.sample_chain(
num_results=num_results,
num_burnin_steps=num_burnin_steps,
current_state=initial_state,
kernel=adaptive_kernel,
trace_fn=lambda cs, kr: kr)
samples, kernel_results = run_chain(
initial_state=np.zeros(num_features+1))
print("Acceptance rate:", kernel_results.inner_results.is_accepted.numpy().mean())
Acceptance rate: 0.634
# Trace plots
colors = ['b', 'g', 'r']
for i in range(3):
plt.plot(samples[:, i], c=colors[i], alpha=.3)
plt.hlines(true_w[i], 0, 1000, zorder=4, color=colors[i], label="$w_{}$".format(i))
plt.legend(loc='upper right')
plt.show()
# Histogram of samples
for i in range(3):
sns.distplot(samples[:, i], color=colors[i])
ymax = plt.ylim()[1]
for i in range(3):
plt.vlines(true_w[i], 0, ymax, color=colors[i])
plt.ylim(0, ymax)
plt.show()
Diagnostyka
Wykresy śledzenia są ładne, ale diagnostyka jest ładniejsza!
Najpierw musimy uruchomić wiele łańcuchów. To jest tak proste, jak dając partii initial_state
tensorów.
# Instead of a single set of initial w's, we create a batch of 8.
num_chains = 8
initial_state = np.zeros([num_chains, num_features + 1])
chains, kernel_results = run_chain(initial_state)
r_hat = tfp.mcmc.potential_scale_reduction(chains)
print("Acceptance rate:", kernel_results.inner_results.is_accepted.numpy().mean())
print("R-hat diagnostic (per latent variable):", r_hat.numpy())
Acceptance rate: 0.59175 R-hat diagnostic (per latent variable): [0.99998395 0.99932185 0.9997064 ]
Próbkowanie skali szumu
# Define the joint_log_prob function, and our unnormalized posterior.
def joint_log_prob(w, sigma, x, y):
# Our model in maths is
# w ~ MVN([0, 0, 0], diag([1, 1, 1]))
# y_i ~ Normal(w @ x_i, noise_scale), i=1..N
rv_w = tfd.MultivariateNormalDiag(
loc=np.zeros(num_features + 1),
scale_diag=np.ones(num_features + 1))
rv_sigma = tfd.LogNormal(np.float64(1.), np.float64(5.))
rv_y = tfd.Normal(f(x, w), sigma[..., np.newaxis])
return (rv_w.log_prob(w) +
rv_sigma.log_prob(sigma) +
tf.reduce_sum(rv_y.log_prob(y), axis=-1))
# Create our unnormalized target density by currying x and y from the joint.
def unnormalized_posterior(w, sigma):
return joint_log_prob(w, sigma, xs, ys)
# Create an HMC TransitionKernel
hmc_kernel = tfp.mcmc.HamiltonianMonteCarlo(
target_log_prob_fn=unnormalized_posterior,
step_size=np.float64(.1),
num_leapfrog_steps=4)
# Create a TransformedTransitionKernl
transformed_kernel = tfp.mcmc.TransformedTransitionKernel(
inner_kernel=hmc_kernel,
bijector=[tfb.Identity(), # w
tfb.Invert(tfb.Softplus())]) # sigma
# Apply a simple step size adaptation during burnin
@tf.function
def run_chain(initial_state, num_results=1000, num_burnin_steps=500):
adaptive_kernel = tfp.mcmc.SimpleStepSizeAdaptation(
transformed_kernel,
num_adaptation_steps=int(.8 * num_burnin_steps),
target_accept_prob=np.float64(.75))
return tfp.mcmc.sample_chain(
num_results=num_results,
num_burnin_steps=num_burnin_steps,
current_state=initial_state,
kernel=adaptive_kernel,
seed=(0, 1),
trace_fn=lambda cs, kr: kr)
# Instead of a single set of initial w's, we create a batch of 8.
num_chains = 8
initial_state = [np.zeros([num_chains, num_features + 1]),
.54 * np.ones([num_chains], dtype=np.float64)]
chains, kernel_results = run_chain(initial_state)
r_hat = tfp.mcmc.potential_scale_reduction(chains)
print("Acceptance rate:", kernel_results.inner_results.inner_results.is_accepted.numpy().mean())
print("R-hat diagnostic (per w variable):", r_hat[0].numpy())
print("R-hat diagnostic (sigma):", r_hat[1].numpy())
Acceptance rate: 0.715875 R-hat diagnostic (per w variable): [1.0000073 1.00458208 1.00450512] R-hat diagnostic (sigma): 1.0092056996149859
w_chains, sigma_chains = chains
# Trace plots of w (one of 8 chains)
colors = ['b', 'g', 'r', 'teal']
fig, axes = plt.subplots(4, num_chains, figsize=(4 * num_chains, 8))
for j in range(num_chains):
for i in range(3):
ax = axes[i][j]
ax.plot(w_chains[:, j, i], c=colors[i], alpha=.3)
ax.hlines(true_w[i], 0, 1000, zorder=4, color=colors[i], label="$w_{}$".format(i))
ax.legend(loc='upper right')
ax = axes[3][j]
ax.plot(sigma_chains[:, j], alpha=.3, c=colors[3])
ax.hlines(noise_scale, 0, 1000, zorder=4, color=colors[3], label=r"$\sigma$".format(i))
ax.legend(loc='upper right')
fig.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# Histogram of samples of w
fig, axes = plt.subplots(4, num_chains, figsize=(4 * num_chains, 8))
for j in range(num_chains):
for i in range(3):
ax = axes[i][j]
sns.distplot(w_chains[:, j, i], color=colors[i], norm_hist=True, ax=ax, hist_kws={'alpha': .3})
for i in range(3):
ax = axes[i][j]
ymax = ax.get_ylim()[1]
ax.vlines(true_w[i], 0, ymax, color=colors[i], label="$w_{}$".format(i), linewidth=3)
ax.set_ylim(0, ymax)
ax.legend(loc='upper right')
ax = axes[3][j]
sns.distplot(sigma_chains[:, j], color=colors[3], norm_hist=True, ax=ax, hist_kws={'alpha': .3})
ymax = ax.get_ylim()[1]
ax.vlines(noise_scale, 0, ymax, color=colors[3], label=r"$\sigma$".format(i), linewidth=3)
ax.set_ylim(0, ymax)
ax.legend(loc='upper right')
fig.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Jest o wiele więcej!
Sprawdź te fajne posty na blogu i przykłady:
- Seria strukturalny Czas wsparcie blog colab
- Warstwy probabilistyczny Keras (wejście: Tensor, Wyjście: Podział!) Blog colab
- Gaussa regresji Sposób colab utajonego zmiennej Modelowanie colab
Więcej przykładów i zeszyty na naszej GitHub tutaj !